Comments on: 3rd better than 1st? http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/ We Play Games Mon, 21 May 2012 10:43:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Melanson http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/comment-page-1/#comment-22581 Melanson Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:57:33 +0000 http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/#comment-22581 cool picxxs cool picxxs

]]> By: waxc3 http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/comment-page-1/#comment-6845 waxc3 Thu, 14 May 2009 15:39:23 +0000 http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/#comment-6845 once the two stick games came out i found i prefer fps. on the N64 i got simulated motion sickness at those golden eyes and perfect darks on that one stick camera. halo ce was my first fps and since i have been addicted to any fps game. i just feel better BEING the camera (with a gun :) ) once the two stick games came out i found i prefer fps. on the N64 i got simulated motion sickness at those golden eyes and perfect darks on that one stick camera.

halo ce was my first fps and since i have been addicted to any fps game. i just feel better BEING the camera (with a gun :) )

]]> By: Dave http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/comment-page-1/#comment-391 Dave Fri, 16 May 2008 13:40:30 +0000 http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/#comment-391 Bizarre Creation's The Club is a fine example of why 3rd person is the lesser favoured format. It's bloody great but, in terms of targeting precision and ease of play, it has to be FPS for me. ..and this is coming from a guy who five years ago wouldn't set foot near an FPS, now I have a crippling CoD4 online addiction :/ Bizarre Creation’s The Club is a fine example of why 3rd person is the lesser favoured format. It’s bloody great but, in terms of targeting precision and ease of play, it has to be FPS for me.

..and this is coming from a guy who five years ago wouldn’t set foot near an FPS, now I have a crippling CoD4 online addiction :/

]]> By: James http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/comment-page-1/#comment-316 James Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:17:19 +0000 http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/#comment-316 Hmmm... A tougie there definetly. Both types of shooters have thier fair share of gems and crap-fests... Id have to agree though with Dave, FPS are a bit more better thanks to a mostly easier sense of movment and not some back of a guy blocking the screen. However TPS's are getting back with things like Gears, Lost Planet and Mass Effect. But still FPS Hmmm… A tougie there definetly. Both types of shooters have thier fair share of gems and crap-fests…

Id have to agree though with Dave, FPS are a bit more better thanks to a mostly easier sense of movment and not some back of a guy blocking the screen.

However TPS’s are getting back with things like Gears, Lost Planet and Mass Effect. But still FPS

]]> By: Dave http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/comment-page-1/#comment-315 Dave Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:06:37 +0000 http://ready-up.net/2008/04/29/3rd-better-than-1st/#comment-315 Interesting point. For my part I've biased towards the FPS ever since Doom. For a TPS I think the question of how much of the playing area is visible depends on where the camera is placed...not high enough and the character themselves block the view, too high and you lose a sense of involvement in the game. Still, give me a good GPS any day :-) Interesting point.

For my part I’ve biased towards the FPS ever since Doom. For a TPS I think the question of how much of the playing area is visible depends on where the camera is placed…not high enough and the character themselves block the view, too high and you lose a sense of involvement in the game.

Still, give me a good GPS any day :-)

]]>